Clinical Trac vs Trajecsys: which is better for your program?
Short answer: Programs that switched from Trajecsys to Clinical Trac™ report easier daily use, better mobile experience, and superior customer support — especially for Respiratory Therapy CoARC accreditation.
| Feature | Clinical Trac™ | Trajecsys |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | Under 2 weeks, named specialist | Varies; longer setup reported |
| Mobile app | Native iOS & Android, GPS clock-in | Limited mobile experience |
| Support | Named specialist answers the phone | Ticket-based support |
| CoARC / IRR | Built-in IRR analytics & surveys | Basic reporting |
| Sites & preceptors | Unlimited included | May have limits |
| Migration help | Roster, hours, forms import | N/A |
"We started with Trajecsys but were never able to fully implement it… I found it to be clunky and not very user-friendly. After a Clinical Trac demonstration, I was sold." — Northern Kentucky University RT Program
Also compare: migration from Typhon, DataArc, and Exxat.